euromail vs Postmark
For European senders weighing Postmark (the deliverability favourite) against an EU-native alternative. Honest differences, no scare tactics, including where Postmark is the better choice.
| euromail.dev | Postmark | |
|---|---|---|
| EU data residency | Email storage and self-hosted AI processing run in Finland. The DPA names ancillary services, including billing outside the EU, and the data each receives. | US-hosted (ActiveCampaign); no EU data residency option |
| Data processing agreement | DPA included on every plan, including Free, not gated behind Enterprise. | DPA with Standard Contractual Clauses |
| Deliverability visibility | Deliverability insights included free: live delivery latency, DMARC monitoring, Google Postmaster + Microsoft SNDS integration. We publish our own numbers at /deliverability/. | Excellent built-in delivery visibility |
| Inbound email | Core feature: inbound routes, mailboxes with lease/ack delivery, agent mailboxes for AI workloads. | Inbound parsing is first-class |
| Pricing | Free tier (3,000 emails/mo), then from €19/mo. DPA, insights, and inbound on every plan. | From $15/mo for 10,000 emails |
When Postmark is the better choice
Postmark's deliverability reputation is earned and its message-streams model is genuinely good. If your recipients are mostly outside the EU and your DPA review accepts US processing, Postmark is hard to fault.
Why teams switch to euromail
Teams reviewing message residency can verify that EuroMail's email infrastructure and AI processing run in Finland. The DPA names the ancillary subprocessors and their data access, including billing outside the EU. GDPR export and erasure tools are built in. We publish our own live delivery numbers, sample sizes included, at euromail.dev/deliverability. When you're ready, the move is a config change, not a rewrite. The migration guide covers the API mapping, DNS dual-running, webhooks, and suppressions.